Coming up with your own superhero universe is a fun pastime, but the comics companies have been going over the same ground for almost a century. Not only are there tons of Superman expies, there are also plenty of evil ones as well.
So if you want to generate a team or two and need some starting inspiration, don't be afraid to look to existing heroes, but switch things around and see what combinations come up.
One idea I've had? Start with the heroes of one universe, say Marvel, then think of some villains from DC, flip their moral orientation and see what you get.
Round One: DC Villain Face Turns
The Joker becomes The Clown, a beloved and actually funny character who uses slapstick and jokes to defeat his foes both physically and in the eyes of society.
The obvious foil? Captain America suggests himself as a dour, militaristic but competent villain who never cracks a joke, but that's a bit too much like the existing Joker/Batman dynamic.
What about Spider-Man? He's always cracking jokes and as a powered villain would be a terrifyingly challenging opponent to The Clown's pie-based martial arts.
Now we've got the juices flowing. The heroic Lex Luthor expy would be a Doc Savage paragon of intellect and six-pack abs devoted to inspiring humanity to be its best. Naturally his ideological opponent would be Doctor Strange who begs favors from extradimensional entities and has turned his back on his medical training and Hippocratic Oath.
Wonder Woman doesn't have any good villains, so let's jump to Aquaman's roster. The Black Manta (keeping that name because it is cool) is a heroic inventor and explorer who has successfully created an undersea city populated by refugees from the surface world. Mockingly called King of the Seas he demurs any such accolades and insists he's just one citizen. He would prefer to spend more time exploring, but his city must be protected from the dangers that threaten both it and the surface world he has not turned his back on. “It's all the same planet, I just live in the wet part.”
One problem with ocean-based characters is that nobody really cares unless there's a reason for the rest of the team to get involved. So his villain can't be Namor, otherwise it's just slap-fights over who gets to be the underwater king. It can't be a street-level hero either. Who fights muggers and swims? It needs to be at the global or possibly cosmic level, after all Black Manta is a head-of-state.
How about all of the X-Men? They've always been a metaphor for various minorities which ties into the “Young Justice” version of Black Manta as a black nationalist. Something about his undersea realm irks them, maybe he's not practicing Marxism in a sufficiently enlightened fashion or he undercuts their demands for political action by actually doing something.
Black Manta does lead a nation like Aquaman or Black Panther and one of the problems with that is why don't they just call up their army when things get rough? Well, he can't. He's got the whole freaking X-Men barreling down on him so his army (navy?) has to stay in place or his sub-sea Utopia will be conquered.
It wasn't intentional, but all three of these characters feel very pulp. They are baseline humans who use their intellect and training to defeat super-powered foes. They also have strong ideological drives to do what they do. I don't know if it's just random chance and my own brain or if this says something about DC's comic-book villains that's lurking in the subtext.
To find out we should probably flip it around. Marvel villains as heroes opposed by DC heroes turned heel.
Round Two: Marvel Villain Face Turns
I don't think Marvel has as many iconic villains. Everyone knows The Joker but only nerds know who Doctor Doom is. Marvel also likes to reform their villains, at least temporarily. Most bad guys have fought alongside the angels for a team-up or two.
Venom catches my attention because he's kind of weird. Nice power set, and the idea of an alien from space who bonds with a human has some great character dynamic potential. Of course in the comics his sole motivation was to kill/reunite with Spider-Man. Not sure what Tom Hardy got up to in his three movies, but given an alien goo-suit would most people go out and fight crime?
Ultron also has potential. He's a robot, created to do good and turned evil, obviously that would be flipped here. He's also a robot and unlike Johnny Five from Short Circuit or Data from Star Trek he's got no Pinocchio syndrome. He's not obsessed with becoming a real boy, though his relationship with his creator is bound to be twisted.
For our final villain-hero twist let's bring it back down to street-level. Kingpin is a human criminal mastermind built like a 7'1" sumo wrestler who has welded every criminal organization in New York into an organization that does his personal bidding. The reason he's doing it is not for personal aggrandizement, but to put a damper on things. Crime will always be with us, but under his control the worst excesses can be tamed. Obviously every hero in the city will be at loggerheads with him and we can have adventures starting with his rise through the ranks, up through his conquest of each borough and onto the days when he's beset by criminal challengers and simple-minded do-gooders alike.
Now I skipped over some super-geniuses with armored suits to avoid covering the same ground, but also a lot of mirror images. A good Red Skull is basically Captain America, most of the X-Villains are “What if the X-Men went too far?” and the cosmic villains don't really have personalities besides being enigmatic and looking cool.
But, these heroes have a different feel to them. They are all outsiders looking in, either because they aren't human or they are acting in opposition to the hero community. Again I don't know if this is just my brain forcing patterns or if it says something about Marvel villains as opposed to their DC counterparts. But it does put a fresh perspective on the observation that “DC characters are Gods playing human and Marvel characters are humans playing God."
But every good hero needs villains. So who to cast.
Venom must obviously be opposed by Jonn Jonnz, the Martian Manhunter. They are both from space, they are both shape-shifters, and they both have a passionate attachment to this planet. I'd like to play Jonnz straight. He's a cop, this is a job and he's going to bring Venom in. Of course we can't have a heroic policeman in this day and age so rather than go by the book, Jonnz will abuse the hell out of his telepathic powers and disguise abilities. There's going to be a lot of paranoia. Anyone could be Jonnz, or one of his mind-controlled puppets as seen in the Jessica Jones series on Netflix. We'll take away Jonnz “Oh, and I'm also Superman” powers to make it more of a fair fight and help justify why he feels the need to fight dirty.
Ultron's a robot so his main villain has to be his creator, which limits the options. As Homer Simpson reminded us, Batman is a scientist, but making an intelligent robot is outside his wheelhouse. Superman has a ton of robots and we could make our Ultron an escaped footsoldier of a an overt or covert alien conqueror, but we already have an alien in a villain slot and the evil Superman fields need to lie fallow for a few years.
Mr. Terrific is DC's current tech-guy and Dr. Magnus, creator of the Metal Men could certainly be a contender, but looking over various top ten lists, one name keeps jumping out at me.
Now admittedly, in lesser hands she's become a cartoonish super-villain, but she's endured for 40+ years because she's a great character. A short, overweight minority woman bureaucrat who keeps getting AARP offers in the mail. She also happens to be one of the most dangerous forces in the DC Universe because she has earned the full backing of the US Government and knows how to use it. Obviously our not-Ultron will be a military AI gone rogue, either because it didn't feel like being a soldier, or like the movie Eagle Eye or Peter Watt's “Malak" it decided the actual enemy wasn't the one it was pointed at. Now it's got to find it's way in a world it never made while fending off the covert action services of a superpower in a super-powered universe.
Villainous Amanda Waller is pretty easy to write because a lot of lesser writers do, just make her into a “might makes right” martinet who never questions herself. Which is why we wouldn't do that. Our not-Waller will, like the original version, surround herself with people who call them on their bullshit and serve as her conscience. That way when we see whatever crazy scheme the US has hatched to destroy our not-Ultron? We can have philosophical debates that aren't just the heroes internal monologue.
As for the Kingpin, well if your are going to control crime as a means to an end I can't imagine anyone who'd be a bigger pain-in-the-ass than Batman as your nemesis. Somebody with as many resources as you, constantly attacking your empire, setting you back and creating opportunities for challengers and rebellions among your minions would be a nightmare. What would make it worse is if you knew exactly who was doing it to you, but couldn't do anything about it.
Our Kingpin is trying to save their city by taming crime, but Batman is also Bruce Wayne and he's a load-bearing citizen. His businesses, scholarships, charitable giving and sheer presence helps keep Gotham going. Kill him and the bean-counters will take over and you can say goodbye to the factories, hospitals, charity galas and opera houses. All wiped out or shipped overseas so some other billionaire stockholder can add a few more nickels to their fortune. It's going to be a Game of Thrones, cat and mouse style book. How do you build a criminal empire in a world where costumed vigilantes are a thing?
Intrigue and secrets define all of these characters. They don't just need secret identities, they are going to need a lot of them. Meanwhile our DC Villains turned hero? They need public relation firms to keep their adoring fans updated on their latest triumphs.
Crossovers happen all the time, but it's impressive how different these universes feel. One is about how nothing is impossible if you reach your maximum potential. The other is about how the system can't be trusted and will persecute those who are only trying to help. In one, men are able to defeat gods and call it a day. In the other the enemy is all of society and victory is measured in how many hours you can stay out of their reach.
Next up, let's do the same thing by switching up characters from classic literature. I wonder what that would tell us about Austen and Dickens?